50/47

Constantly jumping between different moments in the relationship prevents the audience from fully immersing themselves in key events

Chronology

An aspiring chef and a recent divorcee find their lives changed forever when a chance meeting brings them together in a decade-long, deeply moving romance. Florence Pugh described filming this project as “one of the highlights of [her] career.” Is It a SinWritten by Al Hazan Starring Allie Hazan. Non-Linear Structure: The Double-Edged Sword We Live in Time makes a bold narrative choice by using a non-linear structure. While this adds complexity to the story, making it feel like a series of fragmented memories or dreamlike flashbacks, it comes at the cost of emotional connection.

A more linear approach could allow for a deeper connection

As a result, some key moments are rushed and we miss the chance to really absorb the emotions and implications of certain scenes. Almut’s Career: A Missed Opportunity One of the elements I missed in the book Living in Time was a deeper dive into Almut’s career as a chef. We’re told that cooking is her passion, but the film doesn’t spend much time exploring why it’s so important to her. What sacrifices has she made to get where she is?

Product Placement: A Little Diversion Let’s talk about Weetabix moments

What role does the kitchen play in her identity and how does it conflict with her personal struggles? By not focusing more on this aspect, the film misses an opportunity to add depth to her character. It would not only help connect the viewer more with her journey, but also make her internal conflict about balancing career and family feel more urgent and relatable. When the product literally becomes part of the conversation, it feels like the movie just took a quick break to sell us breakfast.

Their chemistry alone makes the film worth watching

It’s that moment where you ask, "How much did Weetabix pay for that?" It didn’t ruin the movie, but I definitely could have done without the snack ad in the middle of the movie. Strong Performances Hold It Together Despite its flaws, We Live in Time is held together by incredible performances from Garfield and Pugh. Both actors manage to convey raw emotions with depth, carrying the weight of the film’s emotional core. Conclusion In the end, We Live in Time is not a revolutionary film, but it is a heartfelt film.

If you’re a fan of character-driven romances and strong acting, this is a movie worth watching

It’s a deeply personal story of love, time and loss, and while it doesn’t always land every emotional punch, it still offers moments of true beauty. Check out our list of exciting new films from this year’s film festivals, including Venice, TIFF, the New York Film Festival and more.